Patent attorney disciplinary rules case
See Andrew v. Beverly, 415 F.Supp.2d 919, 79 USPQ2d 1824 (N.D. Ill. 2006)
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 5:52 PM
Monday, February 19, 2007
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Microsoft v. AT&T oral argument coming soon
- Blogger problems
- Litigation, not patent quality, is the real driver...
- Press release on PatentMonkey
- Autism/neurexin link found
- Somers on CIRM grants of Feb. 16
- Cuba honors Herbert Matthews, the man who "invente...
- Curious juxtaposition in patent reform
- Registration of Obama bin Laden mark denied
- East Bay Times: will New Jersey stem cell voters ...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home