Biometric passports: if you can't sell to them, sue them!
Somewhere in between, Lukas Grunwald told wired.com: "The whole [biometric] passport design is totally brain-damaged. From my point of view, all of these [biometric] passports are a huge waste of money - they're not increasing security at all."
Reuters had also reported in May 2006:
"Iris is the only company in the world that provides everything from the front end to the back end in the e-passport business and has a track record," said S. Sharath, an analyst with MIDF Sisma Securities Sdn Bhd.
Iris, already involved in a $246 million job producing 5.5 million passports for Nigeria, may bid for an identity card project now worth $300 million in the same country, Malaysia's Business Times reported on Monday, citing analysts.
Tan declined comment on the report.
Iris says it owns three patents for its design and electronic biometric passport process, including those for the United States.
"Iris has a track record and a huge addressable market that's driven by the U.S., and that's going to force global adoption," said another analyst.
In Dec. 2006, XFN also noted that Iris said a lawsuit against Japan Air Lines has also been filed in a US court for the eastern district of New York which "seeks damages for patent infringement by JAL's use, at US airports, of e-passports... that have been manufactured according to the Iris electronic identification or e-passport patent."
1 Comments:
Hi,
Do you following on their Court case? What's the chances that IRIS will win the case?
Rgds
Post a Comment
<< Home