Intellectual property news affecting business and everyday life
Friday, October 20, 2006
Med-Rad prevails over Tyco in dispute over RE 37,602
The CAFC concluded that the defect that led to the re-issue patent fell within the plain meaning of 35 USC 251 and reversed the WD Pa. The issue was about supplemental declarations.
Although MedRad ultimately won, the CAFC noted that the cases cited by MedRad were inapposite to the issue on appeal.
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted
in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home