Dispute over inventorship in Erbitux patent
In recent weeks, U.S. District Judge Naomi Buchwald has heard testimony from Sela, Schlessinger and other top cancer researchers. She has not yet ruled, and it is not clear when she might do so. But she was critical of many of the arguments presented by lawyers for ImClone and Aventis during closing statements Wednesday.
**
Thus, Erbitux is brought to us through the Bayh-Dole Act.
**
Of academics and patents:
Sela said he had never paid much attention to patents.
"I don't mind if I don't take a patent, unless it's stolen from me. Then I have to react," he said. "At the beginning, when I first saw it, I was in a state of shock. I mean, money is not important, but my name and my science, my honor demanded" that he be put on the patent.
Dr. Esther Aboud-Pirak, another of the three Yeda researchers, said she was 27 years old and disinterested in patents when she did the bulk of the research work on the method.
Under cross examination, Aboud-Pirak grew testy as she acknowledged that each of the three researchers could share in any money Yeda receives as a result of the litigation.
(...)
George Badenoch [Kenyon & Kenyon], a lawyer for ImClone, told the judge that Yeda did nothing to pursue the claim from 1988, when the researchers wrote a paper on the subject, to several years ago, after they learned a patent was issued in 2001.
"It's not proper now that we have got a blockbuster product for them to come in and say, `Hey, now we want to participate, now we got to be paid.'"
**
Schlessinger has been involved with other drugs:
"This is all a continuum of discoveries that started in the early 1980s," says Joseph Schlessinger, chairman of the pharmacology department at Yale School of Medicine and a co-founder of Sugen, the company that created Sutent. "We are now in a golden age of drug discovery."
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home