ConFold v. Polaris: NDAs in CA7
A case taking a hard line on nondisclosure agreements (NDAs) is ConFold, Inc. v. Polaris, Inc., 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 513 (CA7 Jan. 10, 2006) (Posner J.).
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 7:22 PM
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Indian patent trap awaiting Cipla and Ranbaxy over...
- Judge Spencer rejects hearing proposed by DOJ
- Cert granted in MedImmune v. Genentech on Feb. 21
- Comments on stem cells from AAAS meeting
- SNU to be audited over Hwang-gate
- The Christian Science Monitor asks: why lie?
- What's the true story on patent invalidity determi...
- Two articles on IP coursework in law school appear...
- Is there a gulf between legal academics and the Fe...
- More articles on stem cell funding and Woo Suk Hwang
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home