Biagro/UCal vs. Grow More
In an infringement case with a university plaintiff, the CAFC affirmed a judgment for the defendant Grow More. The case concerned fertilizer.
The CAFC cited Innova, 381 F.3d 111 (CAFC 2004) and Festo 535 US 722. Plaintiff tried to rebut the Festo presumption based on tangential and some other reason, and failed therein.
The CAFC cited Innova, 381 F.3d 111 (CAFC 2004) and Festo 535 US 722. Plaintiff tried to rebut the Festo presumption based on tangential and some other reason, and failed therein.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 2:06 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home