Enzo Biochem v. Gen-Probe
Enzo Biochem attempted to appeal a decision from SDNY, but the failure to have adjudicated the inequitable conduct claim led to dismissal of the appeal.
posted by Lawrence B. Ebert at 4:03 PM
Wednesday, July 13, 2005
About Me
- Name: Lawrence B. Ebert
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
Previous Posts
- Goodenough case
- Star-Ledger: Able Labs fabricated test data
- More on Phillips v. AWH and dictionaries in claim ...
- Phillips v. AWH decided July 12; Phillips gets remand
- More discussion of patent reform
- In re Steelbuilding.com on descriptive marks, seco...
- Spin control in aftermath of EU rejection of softw...
- Buckyballs, again
- US 6,913,466 (Microsoft) on grooving and becoming ...
- Anything you blog can be held against you...
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home