Intellectual property news affecting business and everyday life
Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Trintec v. Pedre on personal jurisdiction
The case is about personal jurisdiction, and the CAFC cites to (among other cases) Silent Drive, 326 F3d 1194, HollyAnne, 199 F3d 1304, and Burger King, 471 US 462.
The case is an example of a remand because the district court did not create a sufficient record.
I'm a patent lawyer located in central New Jersey. I have a J.D. from the University of Chicago and a Ph.D. from Stanford University, where I studied graphite intercalation compounds at the Center for Materials Research. I worked at Exxon Corporate Research in areas ranging from engine deposits through coal and petroleum to fullerenes. An article that I wrote in The Trademark Reporter, 1994, 84, 379-407 on color trademarks was cited by Supreme Court in Qualitex v. Jacobson, 514 US 159 (1995) and the methodology was adopted
in the Capri case in N.D. Ill. An article that I wrote on DNA profiling was cited by the Colorado Supreme Court (Shreck case) and a Florida appellate court (Brim case). I was interviewed by NHK-TV about the Jan-Hendrik Schon affair. I am developing ipABC, an entity that combines rigorous IP analytics with study of business models, to optimize utilization of intellectual property. I can be reached at C8AsF5 at yahoo.com.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home