Raggett art was in Microsoft/Eolas litigation

There has been some discussion about whether or not the prior art cited in the filing under 37 CFR 1.501 by W3C was known previously by Microsoft. In fact, Raggett-I and Raggett-II were introduced in the Microsoft/Eolas litigation, as the brief of W3C (written by Pennie & Edmonds) clearly indicates:

While we understand that the submitted prior art was introduced during the course of the recent trial proceedings, the issue of whether it renders the '906 patent invalid was never considered.