Saturday, October 11, 2014

Mandamus denied by CAFC in IN RE FUJITSU LIMITED AND FUJITSU NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. but granted in Google case

The CAFC noted:

In seeking a writ of mandamus, petitioners must es-
tablish a “clear and indisputable” right to relief and
that they “lack adequate alternative means to obtain the
relief” they seek. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S.
367, 380-81 (2004)


But note that the Cheney case was also cited in the Google case (2014-147 ), wherein
the CAFC granted mandamus.


See also Google finally wrests Rockstar patent suit out of East Texas


Post a Comment

<< Home