Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Kapusta v. Gale: another district court claim construction vacated

In the nonprecedential Kapusta v Gale Corp., the CAFC addressed the meaning of the term "hand-grip size case." Kapusta argued that the term should mean a case that is suited to a grip by a hand. The CAFC cited Phillips v. AWH, 415 F.3d 1303 and agreed with Kapusta, vacating the ED Ca district court decision and remanding.


Post a Comment

<< Home